Skip to main content

Reuse or Rewrite AndroMDA Cartridges?

Someone asked me what is the best way to work with AndroMDA in case that the architecture (structure, naming, process, etc.) is different than the AndroMDA's one. Reuse all the cartridges as far as possible and extend them or rewrite them from scratch?

My opinions are as follow:
  • Think of a framework everytime you use AndroMDA. This includes the cartridges AndroMDA offers. When you are using frameworks you mostly don't want to rewrite them. You want to reuse and extend them. So, reuse and extend already available AndroMDA cartridges is the way to go.
  • If your team is only a small team never think of building your own architecture, thus you don't need to rewrite the cartridges. By building your own architecture (e.g. using your own directory structure, using your own naming convention, etc.) you mostly need to write your own cartridges which is costly. Remember that the developers of AndroMDA and AndroMDA cartridges are not beginners. They had many thoughts poured into the cartridges and most of them are experienced architects and developers. So you can be sure that the architecture of applications generated by AndroMDA cartridges are a stable architecture and has a good thought.
  • Never forget that AndroMDA is an Open Source project. If you think you have better ideas just join them and give them some inputs to make the available cartridges much more better!
So, when should we write our own cartridges?
  • In case that you are doing a re-engeneering project which means that you have all those source codes and you want to integrate AndroMDA cartridges slowly into the whole application development process you need to write your own cartridges. In this situation you can slowly "generate" some of the repeating codes by using your own cartridges. Already available AndroMDA cartridges will mostly miss this purpose. But again, if you write a new application reuse and extend available AndroMDA cartridges as far as you can.
  • Only build your own architecture and thus create your own cartridges if you and your team have the capacity and resources to do this.
Happy modeling,


Hi Lofi,

It's a great comment. Thx for your response to my email.

I still have some thought may be i need more time to explore about AndroMDA.
Anyway my biggest problem is we already have our own standard that different to AndroMDA cartridges.
Hope i will find a better way to our team.

Yesterday, i have try to make a small project using AndroMDA, looks like it helps a lot to our team and hope it can really increase our performance in development :)

Thx you have introduce me to MDA :)

lofidewanto said…
Hi Tjiputra,

nice to hear that AndroMDA helps you and your team to be more productive...

I hope that after using AndroMDA you will have a lot more free time (== computer free timezone ;-))!


Popular posts from this blog

Creating Spring Bean dynamically in the Runtime

In my training someone asked me whether it is possible to create an object (a Spring Bean) dynamically so you can choose which implementation you want to have in the runtime. So at the compile time you don't know what object actually should be created yet. The application should decide what object to be created based on a property file.

1. We create an annotation so we can mark the method which should be able to create the object dynamically:

package your.package;
public @interface InjectDynamicObject {
2. Use the new created annotation in your method which should be able to create the object dynamically:
... @Named("customerBo") public class CustomerBoImpl implements CustomerBo { ...     @Override @InjectDynamicObject public Customer getDynamicCustomer() {         return this.dynamicCustomer; } ...
3. Write an aspect with Pointcut and Advise which change the object returned by the method in the step 2:
... @Named @Aspect public class Dyn…

Software Development Macro and Micro Process

If you think that in year 2012 all companies which produce software and IT divisions in our world have already their optimized software development process, you are wrong. It seems that we - software architects, software developers or whatever your title is - still need to optimize the software development process in many software companies and IT divisions.

So what do you do if you enter a software company or IT division and you see following things:

1. There is a perfect project management process to handle all those development of software butit is a pure project management without a context to software development. So basically you only take care of cost, time, budget and quality factors. In the software development you still use the old fashioned waterfall process.

2. From the tooling point of view: you have a project management planning and controlling tool but you are still in the beginning of Wiki (almost no collaboration tool) andyou don't use issues tracking system to han…